Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is set to revive plans for a judicial overhaul that could significantly alter the country’s Supreme Court and its functions. The proposed changes aim to limit the court’s power to strike down legislation and modify the process for appointing justices, a move that has reignited debate in a nation already divided over judicial reforms.
The judicial overhaul, which sparked widespread protests in 2023, was paused following the October 7 attacks and the subsequent formation of a unity government. Although some measures have progressed, major reforms were deferred until after the next election. The renewed initiative proposes reducing who can petition the Supreme Court, a change supporters argue will bolster the Knesset and curb judicial intervention in legislative matters.
Under the new plan, the method for appointing Supreme Court justices would change, eliminating the veto power previously held by professional representatives. Instead, appointments would require cooperation between the ruling coalition and the opposition. In cases of deadlock, each side would gain the ability to appoint a justice, potentially reshaping the court’s composition as several justices are due to retire in the coming years.
Proponents of these reforms contend that they will enhance majority rule by reining in what they view as an overly powerful judiciary. However, critics, including opposition lawmakers and legal experts, warn that diminishing judicial oversight could erode checks on government power and increase political influence over the courts, potentially affecting areas such as media regulation and religious affairs.
The debate over judicial reform is anticipated to be a central issue in the upcoming election, with discussions likely focusing on the balance of power between the judiciary and the government. As the nation deliberates on these changes, the role and independence of the Supreme Court remain at the forefront of Israel’s political discourse.